🔗 Share this article

In a significant regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an order sought by the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner applied to the classification board to officially classify the available footage. The board first determined the content was "refused classification", a designation that empowered the regulator to order social media companies to geo-block the videos for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X asserted that the footage in question contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant argued the video was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". X even compared the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the board changed the rating of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the panel held a contrary view, contending the post was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of entertainment and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as that footage was released years after the event, "once emotions around the matter had calmed".

Reactions to the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, X welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this decision to defend freedom of expression and the importance of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain committed to protecting these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to users who are minors".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the eSafety commissioner did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.