🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that may create as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

This decision occurs during a national fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, boundary revision happens after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas AG welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party officials criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A senior House leader said the court had yet again eroded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.