A follow-up group of jazz musicians has withdrawn from a scheduled performance at the newly titled performing arts venue in Washington, D.C., giving just a couple of days advance warning before their December 31st concert.
Announcement Cites The Genre's History of Resistance for Freedom
The band, hailed as a critically acclaimed collective of legendary players, did not give a direct explanation for their decision. However, in a public announcement, they noted: “The art form was born of resistance and from a relentless insistence on free expression: freedom of thought, of expression, and of the complete human experience.”
“Whenever our shared history begins to be handled like something you can prohibit, remove, rechristen, or remarket for somebody else’s ego, I won't appear on that stage and feel at peace at night.”
Renaming Decision Triggers Outcry and Legal Action
The band's withdrawal follows a recent vote to change the title of the renowned venue. This decision has sparked significant criticism and led to court challenges. In the wake of the decision, the exterior signage was amended.
Subsequently, a drummer and vibraphonist cancelled a December 24th show. The venue's leader, a political appointee, issued a threat to sue, claiming the withdrawal was a expensive “political stunt” that hurt the charitable organization.
String of Withdrawals Encompasses Folk Singer and Ensemble
This latest cancellation adds to a number of acts backing out. A folk singer stated the termination of a show set for next month. In a similar move, a performance group said they are cancelling two performances set for April, referencing the renaming as the main cause.
In reaction to these actions, the center's president claimed, “Performances are for all people and the left are mad about it.” He further suggested that the performers had been booked by a previous administration with a specific political leaning.
Band Member Speaks Out on Online Platform
The ensemble addressed their fans, stating they shared the sadness and restated their dedication to music that bridges gaps. Yet, one saxophone player offered a more direct view in a social media post.
He wrote he “would never even consider performing in a location bearing a name (and being run by the kind of board) that represents blatant prejudice and intentional undermining of the cultural contributions of Black Americans.”
He recalled the rich legacy of jazz musicians taking a stand for equality, saying that legends of the music “must be turning in their graves to see me perform on a platform under such circumstances and abandon all we sacrificed for.”
